Can-Am Maverick Forum banner

Paddle comparisons for X3

1 reading
464K views 1.7K replies 146 participants last post by  Speed Buggy  
#1 ·
I know, here we go again!!!

So I was at st Anthony for 9 days last week, rained almost entire time again. I had (2) full sets of tires. 30/11/14 10 paddle extremes and Tom's (TIK in forum, he runs them on his X3 DS) full set 28" #2 STU paddles with 3 rib fronts

Extremes: throw sand like crazy, lots of wheel speed, the fronts even buffed do help in 4wd, very fast on top end, decent stability when dunning at high speed, 7" rims all corners, running 9 psi = conclusion, not enough tire for tuned machines, would be perfect on stock machine though

STU 28" #2 : more paddles helped launch harder, not throwing as much sand, more stable while dunning due to being wider, 4wd didn't seem much different, turned better, slower on top end, being shorter was noticeable as that extra ground clearance is needed when coming into dips fast not wanting to plow front end carrying momentum, 8 wide rims front, 10" rear, overall weight was close on fronts, rears were few lbs heavier each, running 9psi = conclusion, molded are less fragile in lave / rocky area, would prefer these in 30" if I was to buy, they dune better when running high speed due to width, would even consider a #1 paddle maybe?


If it's any hint of wet sand, stock 30" tires aired down do better then any paddle, I saw stock machines doing very well while it was slightly wet, as things dried out paddles had advantage

So now I am going to buy a set of 31.5" or 30"stagger rippers and run them on 8" front and back I think, there goes another $2k


Matt
 
#348 ·
All I know is when I had my STU paddles 80/20 cut it was to take some of the bite out of the tire allowing the ass end to come around, if I want it to, and less drag. When I bought my car my sales guy, Art Wood (RIP), told me to do the 80/20. He told me the full paddle sucked on the 2 seat XP.

I would think a staggered skat would be doing the same thing as doing a 80/20 or 70/30 cut on a STU. The reason they have more bite on initial take off is because there are more paddles - shocker I know. I guess the best way to feel the difference would be to have a 12 or 14 paddle skat and then switch to a 12 or 14 paddle staggered skat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maverick4me2
#349 ·
I would think a staggered skat would be doing the same thing as doing a 80/20 or 70/30 cut on a STU. The reason they have more bite on initial take off is because there are more paddles - shocker I know. I guess the best way to feel the difference would be to have a 12 or 14 paddle skat and then switch to a 12 or 14 paddle staggered skat.
Would the skats and the Stu both have to have the same roll out as well?

I think the 12 paddle staggered rippers would have the same bite from a dig as the car wants to squat and be buried in the sand until it gets on top.
 
#351 ·
Would the skats and the Stu both have to have the same roll out as well?

I think the 12 paddle staggered rippers would have the same bite from a dig as the car wants to squat and be buried in the sand until it gets on top.
I was just using the STU 80/20 cut as an example. To feel the difference it would have to be a skat with same roll out with full paddles and staggered paddles. Same paddle count and same style paddle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oneshotkyle
#353 ·
I've ran staggers and straight 30x13 skats on my xp4. What I experienced is EXACTLY what Tim told me I would. His words were, "the straights will perform slightly better out of the hole, in a drag race, and/or hill climb than the staggers. The staggers however will provide slightly better turning and side hilling performance than the straights"

He was correct. After trying both, I didn't dislike either one significantly more than the other. I stuck with the straights because they do provide better climbing ability and Dumont has very tall/steep dunes. From everything I've experienced from quads to side by sides, staggered paddles do not provide a better hole shit. That is backed up by the guy who makes all of our tires. Take it for what it's worth.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 
#354 ·
That is backed up by the guy who makes all of our tires. Take it for what it's worth.
Just so there is no confusion with your comment. Tim makes the carcass. Skat makes the paddles. Skat buffs and vulcanizes the paddles as per dealer or customer requests. I have been working with and running Skats way before Tim designed and made the Xtreme carcass. Don't get me wrong, Tim is a good guy and has some good knowledge, but the true manufacture, The guys at Skat are the real know it alls. Just saying...
 
#355 ·
I never take anyone's word for it. I have run and tested both on my cars. Regardless of paddle count or style, these tires work and get tailored to the buyer. If I would have listened to Tim and bought 10pdl extremes I'd been heartbroken at the performance on an x3 in Oregon dunes. I ordered 12pdl staggered from him before I even had the car last October. Different riding areas, elevations, sand variances, driving styles, air pressures, wheel widths all play into how one particular tire performs. Don't just preach what you hear

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
#356 ·
Gotta love paddle talk.
Those Skats Tim just took over to Ride Now. They weighed the Blackturds front and rear and boy o boy are they stout. I look forward to grudge races with guys that have them on there cars with a flash lol cause they will need that extra power.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: MCI
#398 ·
Would be better to see them comp cut to be a better more fair comparison. Yes they are heavier, no argument there!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#357 ·
All tires are mounted on DWT ultimates

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
#358 ·
Better picture of the scale
Image


Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
#364 ·
If you can believe it those 32s measured out to 33.5 on the Rears on an 10"Wide wheel at 15 psi. No stretch time right out of the box and they will stretch some and grow.
Fronts 33.75 on a 8" wide wheel.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
#360 ·
So by the looks of the math.
Let's see.
36.4 - 21.6 =14.8 Ă—2 =29.6 lbs lighter Skats front.
43.8 - 31.2 =12.6 Ă—2 =25.2 lbs lighter for rear Skats.
Total 54.8 lbs less Rotating mass for the Skats. I would say that anyone who had any performance knowledge would say that's a pretty damn big difference and definitely gonna feel it and see its gains. Cheap Hp right there.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
#361 ·
54lbs is huge on a 172hp car. That is like having 1/4 of a passenger removed.

Wonder if that loss of rotational mass is zeroed out by the amount of power needed to move those monster roll out tires


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: warlock
#380 ·
Lol. We're they vacuum pumped down.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
#379 ·
Each paddle grabs a bit less sand per revolution than a full paddle. Quicker revolutions than a full paddle out of the hole with a bit less hole shot traction. At speed a bit less drag. Sidehillin the paddles grab at alternating intervals providing, in my opinion, a bit more lateral stability (similar to paddling a kayak). Anyone that has rode a quad with straight paddles and given a bit too much throttle/clutch while turning on a slope or the flats, fairly quickly, has felt the lateral slip and the oh $!*t.
 
#392 ·
I like Fake Warlocks. Lmao

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
#399 ·
Comp cut will shave some weight but not enough and then they leak air all day long requiring you to fill up. Next time your at the sand show early on Saturday or late in the afternoon look at all the cars with comp cuts stus going flat. I watched Packard yamaha go down in a afternoon lol. That's a pain in the ass

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: oneshotkyle
#400 ·
What are we all complaining about. Some one just brought up Skats and a Yamaha Rhino. Man how far we have come. I had this same argument back in 2008 and the tire of choice was the "lumberjack" Skat's. Who remembers being a bad as in their long travel Rhino with lumerscats?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#410 · (Edited)
I as well will be ordering up a set of skats before season starts. So many choices now. Those 32's do look fat.

I have a stage 2 PWRtune. Thinking on going with 32's 12 paddle staggered. I will be riding Glamis every month during season. I mostly ride roadrunner to China. That sand gets soft out there.

Also have to decide between 7" and 8" wheels.
 
#437 ·
From my understanding there are a handful of Xtreme 32x13-14's out there on display at dealers, but none available for sale yet. They are thinking they will be able to start filling wait list orders September some time. The 32x13-15's will be made available after a solid run of 14's is produced, since the 14" wheel size generated more interest than the 15"...I'm kind of surprised by that. Estimated arrival of the 32x13-15 is mid-late October.
This was news to me, but the 32" staggered 12 paddle is only being recommended for the slightly heavier X3 Max while the 31.5-14 is recommended for the 2 seater X3's, the 31.5 is in production already but the 10 paddles currently on backorder.
 
#438 ·
From my understanding there are a handful of Xtreme 32x13-14's out there on display at dealers, but none available for sale yet. They are thinking they will be able to start filling wait list orders September some time. The 32x13-15's will be made available after a solid run of 14's is produced, since the 14" wheel size generated more interest than the 15"...I'm kind of surprised by that. Estimated arrival of the 32x13-15 is mid-late October.
This was news to me, but the 32" staggered 12 paddle is only being recommended for the slightly heavier X3 Max while the 31.5-14 is recommended for the 2 seater X3's, the 31.5 is in production already but the 10 paddles currently on backorder.
You are 100% accurate! I had a chance to talk to Tim today for a good half hour. That's what he told me too. The 32s are suited better for the 4 seat Max, than the 2 seater. He also said that since I have the 30s, the 31s would be a bit better, but not mind boggling better. 31s are for more bottoming out resistance. You have to love a guy that's honest, and not trying to make a sale, just for making a sale!