Can-Am Maverick Forum banner

New 2024 rumors anyone???

1 reading
584K views 3.6K replies 143 participants last post by  milosusa  
#1 ·
I believe it’s only a few weeks until the on-line dealers meeting, just wondering Wtf anyone thinks is about to happen/change for the 2024 lineup. I’m waiting to buy a new XMR RR
What should change on the Mavs anyone dead against anything currently bugging them?
 
#3,288 · (Edited)
No hater here, just pointing out the obvious. It takes watching only a couple of their videos to see exactly what they are all about.

Complained about the ride going slow over the chop with the suspension set as stiff as it can go... Well, duh. Let's see them drive over that same chop with a Polaris set up max stiff. First I've heard of the trans not being in the right gear in ANY situation. Too complicated? Really? High/Low is one button, and is shown on the instrument panel; seems pretty easy to me, but then again I am an engineer, so...

Again, it really only takes watching a couple of their videos to see exactly what their MO is. I have no problems with legitimate reviews/concerns about the R, as I really have no skin in the game since I'm not in the market for a new car (still paying on mine!). But the only legitimate issue they brought up was the tire rub, and that's the first time I've heard of it, so it makes me wonder a bit considering the source.
 
#3,289 ·
I don't, I just assumed it was because of the way Leo treated him. The stuff he said on camera... I can't imagine their interactions off camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McClain210
#3,300 · (Edited)
They are getting free advertisements here!
I stopped watching their shows a year ago. Stupid and has no content of any value. in many of their episodes, they trashed whatever they were riding.
I own a Ram TRX, and a couple of years ago the 5th Gen Ram site was lit up because a low-life bought a TRX jumped it the first day, and trashed a 100K+ truck -- had many youtube hits!!
Many of these idiots are funded by # of hits on their shows on YouTube.
as my favorite actor (movie line) said, opinions are like assholes - everyone has one. and that is the case with morons like these idiots.
I will listen to and respect feedback from professionals (like many hardworking vendors that are investing in R&D time and $) on these vehicles.
 
#3,302 ·
They are getting free advertisements here!
I stopped watching their shows a year ago. Stupid and has no content of any value. in many of their episodes, they trashed whatever they were riding.
I own a Ram TRX, and a couple of years ago the 5th Gen Ram site was lit up because a low-life bought a TRX jumped it the first day, and trashed a 100K+ truck.
Many of these idiots are funded by # of hits on their shows on YouTube.
as my favorite actor (movie line) said, opinions are like assholes - everyone has one. and that is the case with morons like this.
I will listen to and respect feedback from professionals (like many hardworking vendors that are investing R&D time and $) on these vehicles.
That was Whistling Diesel, he trashed a Lamborghini or Ferrari in just a couple of days too. I don’t watch his videos but I still hear about them.
 
#3,311 ·
Stock, it looks like less than an inch clearance. The desert racing R's have at least 3", using wheels with an obvious offset. Pics from the SSSS:
Stock:
Image


Race:
Image
 
#3,312 ·
#3,313 · (Edited)
Defeats "some" of the purpose maybe, but certainly not all. In Can Am's videos, they talk about the tall knuckle improving lateral distribution, roll center, AND steering geometry; the first 2 of which wouldn't be affected by the additional offset at all. And let's be honest, us sand guys already typically run 4+3 offsets up front (5+5 in rear).
 
#3,314 · (Edited)
Can sxsblog people provide actual/tangible proof besides a BS video that is not proof of anything? -- I could care less about the R failures if proven by qualified and intelligent people.
People Must have data that can be V&V'd before they opine!
They (sxsblog) are on public media and, therefore must prove their worth by providing tangible data with their proclamations.
Otherwise, this unqualified source of BS is another many other sources of propaganda that have been running out of control for a while!!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLR
#3,318 ·
Only con I see (other than looks) is a "possible" rubbing issue that is easily addressed with even a 1" offset (that will have a negligible effect on scrub). Is it for every type of riding or every location? Of course not; but that's certainly not a "con". That would be like claiming that the tall skinny tires and snorkels on the X3 MR is a "con" because it's not ideal for desert/dunes. I guess I'm just not seeing the multiple cons that you see.
 
#3,330 ·
"Let's let all the air out of the tires and jump it as high as we can to fabricate something to complain about."
 
#3,333 ·
Too be fair, a lot of us do run stock tires in the sand, and run at 8-10 lbs (but I get your point). I am disappointed that Can Am seems to have overlooked that clearance issue. Stock tires, regardless of how you use the car, will eventually be replaced, quite likely with a different brand/style, and with less than 1/2" of clearance, the rubbing may indeed turn out to be an issue.
 
#3,356 ·
Both ! IMO It’s FAD Ideas. It’s a dirt car’ very little gain for the disadvantage that it brings. The taller the spindle carrier the beefier it’s needs to be. Perhaps if it was a rallying deal but not for most of our use

Double sheer the suspension beef the arms add a real rack and pinion move the center line out to clear the driver compartment so bigger tires can fit without wheels spacers

(I fell like I was measuring a nickel lid) This photo is with a 33 in tire, truthfully I didn’t measure the circumference to figure out the real high but no need you can tell it sucks

look at any of the top TT or class 1 - 10 out there no one is going that route seems BRP brought over a engineer from the airplane division

This Mason rig has no issue with control it’s slightly dated the new ones have portals


View attachment 303884
The tall spindles will not be gone next year, you can count on that. Can Am may modify it to give more clearance, but the advantages that the design brings means that it will still be on their flagship car in the years to come, and may even make it down to the X3 eventually. The only disadvantage that I see is the clearance issue, which can (and likely will) be addressed. Interestingly, that video that you link shows a similar approach, with an oversize spindle raising the upper ball joint, in that case to be along the sidewall. Can Am's design takes it even further. Necessary? We'll see, but when push comes to shove, there is little that is "necessary", but quite a lot that is "better".
 
#3,357 · (Edited)
The tall spindles will not be gone next year, you can count on that. Can Am may modify it to give more clearance, but the advantages that the design brings means that it will still be on their flagship car in the years to come, and may even make it down to the X3 eventually. The only disadvantage that I see is the clearance issue, which can (and likely will) be addressed. Interestingly, that video that you link shows a similar approach, with an oversize spindle raising the upper ball joint, in that case to be along the sidewall. Can Am's design takes it even further. Necessary? We'll see, but when push comes to shove, there is little that is "necessary", but quite a lot that is "better".
WE will see I will give it two years than. Remember the twin I beam saw the shit