I have owned a commander for about two years now and haven't had a single problem with it. I love it. I just bought a Maverick and have about 100 miles on it without any mechanical problems. My confusion is with the forums. I have followed the commander forum for as long as I have owned my commander and I have followed the maverick forum since the day it was started. On the commander forum, the majority of the people felt that they commander was a better machine than the Razor XP even though they are different machines for different purposes. Many people now believe that the Maverick is better than the Commander even though they are different machines for different purposes. I have to agree with the last opinion as I like the way that the maverick rides much better than my commander. So here is my confusion. I keep hearing tons of people bashing on the maverick because of some of the problems it is having. I understand that the clutch and starter are big problems, but they are resolvable. What gets me is that my buddies have razor XP's and have had tons more problems with their XP's than anything reported on the Mavericks. However, I have noticed that more and more people on this forum are talking about the XP's as though they are a much better machine and some people are even buying them over the Maverick after analyzing both. So if the commander was a better machine than the XP as so many stated in the commander forums, and the maverick is a better machine than the commander, how is it that the XP is now a better machine than the Maverick?