[WVRidgeRider]

 

[WVRidgeRider]

 

[WVRidgeRider]

What i like.....Quiet

 

[bitsiphon]

Sp it looks like the XP is a little wider than advertised. interesting. Are you going to do a comparison post on the 2?

 

[WVRidgeRider]

65 Front 66 3/4 rear on my tape. 27 7/8 Tires

 

[C.Moore]

Looks good man, I'll have to come check it out

 

[AReed]

Can you post up some pictures of the front upper a arms please. I saw they had a weird bend in them to clear the steering but the other picture I saw wasn't very good.

 

[AReed]

Oh and also a seat height measurement would be cool too

 

[sand shark]

The XP1000 is really not much bigger than the Maverick. I guess all the RZR guys think it is bigger because they no longer touch shoulders with their passengers. LOL!

It XP is slightly longer and that is about it. The seat heights are pretty close. Put some 29" tire with 14" rims on your Maveick and I bet it make the XP look smaller.

 

[maverickmn]

Don't shoot me...but the XP1K is not a bad looking machine. The arms etc look cheesy, but the CVT system is much more accessable...which is near and dear to us Maverick guys that haven't replaced our clutches yet. Just a nice looking machine. We have issues, they will too. But I'm happy with the Mav and I did pull my deposit on the XP1K I had down, so I'm happy with what I have.

 

[C.Moore]

All I see is fox gold series shocks lol .. The biggest complaint I have about the popo's is the trailing arms, damn things nearly got my killed on a hillclimb due to them hanging low and getting caught on a rock but the xp1's trailing arms do look better

 

[Benzo]

sweet u have a clutched maverick and a xp1000 sitting there

take the extra weight off the maverick - spare tire gas and what not,

and race them PLEASE THX !!!!!

ah I see u have the qsc/stm that doesn't pull like the stm/stm huh ?

 

[maverickmn]

Hell, it still pulls lightyears better than a stock clutch. Besides, a lot of you have the QSC...and some of the rest of us are deciding which way to go. If the QSC doesn't hang with the XP, and a STM does? Might make some decisions easier...and might put some QSC's up for sale reeeeeeaaaaalllll cheap for me to buy.

 

[Canamxteam]

I thought A guy just posted that he was neck to neck with a STM clutch mav verse his stock epi clutched maverick

 

[WVRidgeRider]

sweet u have a clutched maverick and a xp1000 sitting there

take the extra weight off the maverick - spare tire gas and what not,

and race them PLEASE THX !!!!!

ah I see u have the qsc/stm that doesn't pull like the stm/stm huh ?

If there is any difference im sure its minimal.... Im not pullin off anything. All i do is work on these things and thats a ton of extra work. But hey i just happen to have a brand new stock mav out back...

 

[C.Moore]

If there is any difference im sure its minimal

X2 stm rage 3 works very similar to a qsc, the clutch gurus told me the rage 3 would pull harder than a rage 6 on a bone stock mav due to the rage 6 being overkill for a stock tire maverick that the extra weight from the 6 arm design would be a little slower

 

[Benzo]

actually I was thinking of the cvtech was the same as stock , just no belt slip ,

the qsc might pull on a cvtech , hum we need that race to , lol

 

[SheRides]

Your house is gorgeous, by the way. Complete with nice toys. Good work sir

 

[heavysledz]

Your house is gorgeous, by the way. Complete with nice toys. Good work sir

All you can see is his garage….how do you know it isn't attached to a doublewide trailer…not that there is anything wrong with a tornado magnet or anything….. Just kidding…it does look like a nice pad.

 

[SheRides]

All you can see is his garage….how do you know it isn't attached to a doublewide trailer…not that there is anything wrong with a tornado magnet or anything….. Just kidding…it does look like a nice pad.

It's my area if expertise. I know a nice house when I see one Did you see the trees? Beautiful