Good point Sandman. Interesting is a word that certainly describes desert racing and the decisions made by desert racers.
I will say a couple things on the subject. First, not all desert racers are experts on suspension geometry (and neither am I). But I do know plenty of car designers and builders who ARE experts and they definitely build their cars to minimize scrub radius (and all the other correct geometry). First they start with the tire and wheel they plan on running and build around that. What we are doing here is taking a stock car and changing the geometry by putting on different wheels and tires.
Second, in the sxs world it seems to me that until now guys were trying to find ways to widen their generally narrow stock vehicles in order to give it more lateral stability and suspension travel. I think with the x3rs neither of those things matters.
Third, a race car is beefier than a stock utv. Bigger and stronger tie rods, bearings, ball joints, pivot points and bushings, brakes, steering racks, and the list goes on. The extra wear and tear on these parts is perhaps outweighed by the advantage of running a stronger, zero offset wheel. All of that stuff gets replaced every race during prep, whereas the rest of us who just load our cars up and head out every weekend until something breaks don't have that luxury. The difference in stress between proper steering geometry doesn't mean the car will instantly fall apart, but it certainly could mean the difference between getting 1000 miles out of your tie rods and ball joints or getting 3000 miles out of them, or the difference between coming out of a turn on two wheels or coming out on your lid.
In the end a lot of it is as much art as science in my opinion. Based on my own experience I would prefer a wheel/tire combo that is close to stock for what I do.